In this week’s readings, we have two articles essentially
saying the same thing: modern sports reporting is a brand new ballgame. It’s
fast paced, it’s hectic and if you want to keep up, you have to be willing to
throw down.
Dave
Kindred’s piece is about the non-stop schedule of a beat reporter. He relates
how something as mundane as a lineup card, which is routine and posted before
every single baseball game, sends the beat reporters into a tizzy to post the
information to their blogs and Twitter accounts before the next guy does. As
veteran sports reporter Wally Matthews relates, “The beat guys, it matters if
we get the lineup posted first by 45 seconds.” This competitive frenzy leads to
a watered down product in a race to post blasé information first. And that’s
just for the lineup card. Kindred relates how Matthews, who is new to the beat
reporting gig, would spend the entire time at the ballpark, from four hours
prior to the game till two hours afterwards, typing away at stories. Everything
from pregame hype and previews, injury information, to quotes from players,
coaches or management and rumors regarding trades and other acquisitions is
ripe for the presses. And if any information gets missed while a reporter is
writing, he gets scooped by his competitors. That’s why writers are all on
blogs and Twitter now, to give quick, instant updates that require little explanation. Kindred seems to indicate
that the constant flurry of activity leaves a beat reporter little time to
actually get a feel for the game, much less enjoy it.
In Malcolm Moran’s article, we return to the 2010 Randy
Moss trade that Bill Simmons made infamous with his Twitter announcement that
turned sports reporting on its collective ear. Moran talks about the Boston
Globe reporting the trade with Fox’s Jay Glazer as a source, coming from a sports
talk show on Boston’s WEEI (no doubt Glazer had read about it on Bill Simmons’
Twitter). It just goes to show the endless cascade of sources (from Twitter to
a radio station to a newspaper) that lead to what used to be the most reliable source
of information, traditional print. Moran also discusses the time constraints
that this new age of reporting has led to, and the dilemmas this may cause for
reporters. In the rush to be the first out of the starting block with the
information, a reporter may face the prospect of having to rely on an unreliable
source, or not being able to verify the information. Moran warns against this,
as he puts it, the safety net is gone, likely forever.
Both articles seem to lament the advent of the
60-second-per-minute news cycle, while simultaneously embracing it. What we
have given up in details and pretty prose, we have gained in a never-ending
news cycle. This is the way of the modern age of reporting, and we would be
wise to acclimate.
No comments:
Post a Comment